If this film was not generally dismissed by the public, some folks might get cheesed about it, get up some gumption and go picket it like they did 'Last Temptation of Christ'. I dig talking to picketers at these things. I must warn you though, not to argue with the religiously incensed who have not "remained calm"; it's like poking at the pissy raccoon in the dumpster with a stick. Speaking of Last Temptation, I might as well drone on about it some more. This is a well-executed film that explores an interesting hypothesis. Christ was a man and so was imbued with the emotions of a man. What if his greatest secret wish was to continue living life as a man and explore that to its fullest (i.e., get married, have a family, bask in the good harvest, and just be happy)? Would that not be a reasonable thing for the devil to offer him to tempt him off the cross? If Christ was able to rebuke that temptation does that not show people how much he was willing to sacrifice for them? And also, would it make people feel closer to him, knowing about his human side, and what he was willing to give up? For the people picketing the film, the only objection was to J.C. getting some (scrog) action. They felt that they did not want to see their major religious icon doing the deed and spreading his seed (in the proferred temptation scenario) even with a spouse figure. A few would rather have a squeaky-clean icon to inaccessibly hold on high. Some people understood what the film was saying, but thought it was in better taste to just say that Satan tempted Christ and leave it to the reader's imagination to fill in the blanks or not even go there. One dude said that we could hypothesize that Christ spanked the monk (no pun) since he was a human male teenager, but we don't need to explore that since it detracts from his power as a religious icon, due to the goofy stigma that our society associates with masturbation. The ancient Greeks/Romans made their gods have human foibles, so that people could relate to them, but we would rather have some idealistic thing that we can aspire to. Some were concerned that youngsters might miss the general point of the film and get a bad impression of their icon (despite the film's R rating), i.e., that Jesus Christ is a rock (Super)star with groupies and stuff. Some people were cheesed that Mary Magdalene was chosen as the spouse figure (talk about 'Unforgiven'). Needless to say, this film needs to be viewed with an open mind. Also, the music in this film is excellently done.